Conflict between generations is not only necessary, but forces positive change. A clear example is the Vietnam war, whre the younger generation was against it and the old generation was for it. Only through protest and conflict was the younger generation able to change the situation. If we are to continue as progress as people, conflicts between generations are inevitable, and through these conflicts we must listen to the voice of reason to succeed in evolving into a better society.

The Vietnam War was the climax of rising tensions between generations. The older generation was disgusted by the hippies drug use and free love, and the younger generation loathed the old generations oppressive and "Leave it to Beaver" morals. In the Vietnam War, young people were being shipped off to a war they didn't believe in, and were just as quickly brought back in body bags. In response, the young generation began protesting and burning draft cards. Some of these protests, like the one in Kent State, led to fatalities, but they were necessary in order to wake up America. After these tragic deaths, both generations became more receptive to a comprimised change for the better. They realized that though they shared different views, they could agree to work out a plan to please them both. In 1970, descalation of the American presence of Vietnam increased dramatically, but forces still remained. Both sides ended up happy, and only through conflict did they reach a point for drastic change. This proves the necessity of conflict to change and progress society.

Conflict between generations is a reoccuring theme that helps promote social awareness and positive change. Though they may lead to death or injuries, startling events are necessary to open eyes and most importantly, open hearts. Only with protests and conflict can positive social change occur which will allow us to grow as people